Dueling Trailers: ‘No Strings Attached’ vs. ‘Friends With Benefits’, which looks hotter?

LONDON, ENGLAND - OCTOBER 7: (UK TABLOID NEWSPAPERS OUT) Justin Timberlake attends the Social Network Photocall held at The Dorchester on October 07, 2010 in London, England. (Photo by Fergus McDonald/Getty Images)

This week the first trailers for No Strings Attached and Friends With Benefits were released.

Both movies have similar story lines about friends who get physical and both movies were shot over the summer under the working title Friends With Benefits. To make things even more confusing, NBC has a mid-season replacement in the works called also Friends with Benefits which is about, you guessed it, friends who enter into a sexual relationship.

No Strings Attached was shot in Los Angeles and stars Ashton Kutcher and Natalie Portman, while Friends With Benefits stars Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis and was shot in New York, then L.A.

In both trailers, there are a few scenes that will familiar to our regular readers, like a shot of JT and one of his other co-stars, Woody Harrelson on a basketball court erected specifically for FWB as well as a sweet scene between Ashton and Natalie in NSA that was shot in Marina Del Ray.

Since both movies are about hooking up, both trailers feature a lot of sex, so which do you think is hotter, and more importantly, which one do you want to see?

Warning:The FWB trailer is NSFW (but it’s worth the risk to get a peek at Justin Timberlake’s backside!)

2 COMMENTS

Leave a Reply to shala Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here